| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Sleep Med Res > Volume 17(2); 2026 > Article
von Känel, Holzgang, Zuccarella-Hackl, Sivakumar, Pazhenkottil, and Princip: Sleep Disturbance and Occupational Burnout Interact to Increase Arterial Stiffness in Male Physicians

Abstract

Occupational burnout and poor subjective sleep quality are each linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, yet their combined effects on arterial stiffness remain unclear. This study examined whether poor sleep is associated with arterial stiffness, measured by aortic pulse wave velocity, in physicians with burnout. Sixty male physicians (30 with clinical burnout, 30 without) completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and underwent aortic pulse wave velocity assessment using the Arteriograph. Multivariable regression tested independent and interactive associations of burnout and sleep quality, adjusting for heart rate, systolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and physical activity. Poor sleepers were more frequent in burnout (40%) than controls (10%). Although neither burnout nor sleep quality predicted aortic pulse wave velocity, a significant interaction indicated that poorer, particularly shorter, sleep was associated with greater arterial stiffness only in burnout. Findings highlight the potential value of sleep-focused interventions to improve cardiovascular health in occupational stress.

INTRODUCTION

Occupational burnout results from chronic workplace stress and is characterized by exhaustion, mental distancing from work, and reduced professional efficacy, with a high prevalence of 50% among physicians [1]. Beyond its mental health consequences, burnout has been prospectively associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, independent of depression and traditional cardiovascular risk factors [2]. Poor sleep quality, which frequently co-occurs with burnout [3], is itself a well-established predictor of CHD [4]. Physicians are prone to sleep disturbance due to long hours, night shifts, and limited recovery, leading to fragmented and insufficient sleep [3].
Arterial stiffness, assessed by aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao), is a robust marker of vascular aging and an independent predictor of CHD [5]. Poor sleep quality, measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), has been associated with increased PWVao in older adults, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and mood symptoms [6]. Burnout has similarly been linked to increased arterial stiffness in young women [7], but evidence remains scarce, and potential interactive effects of burnout and sleep disturbance on arterial stiffness are unknown.
To address this gap and inform early prevention strategies, we examined whether burnout and poor subjective sleep quality, independently and interactively, are associated with PWVao in male physicians. The focus on men was deliberate, given their higher CHD rates compared to women [8] and the stronger association between occupational stress and CHD risk in men [9]. This study builds on our recent report in the same cohort, where poor sleep predicted impaired coronary microvascular function only in physicians with burnout [10]. Here, we test whether this pattern extends to arterial stiffness, a marker of large-artery health.

METHODS

Study Participants

As described previously [10,11], 60 practicing male physicians were enrolled through various channels for a larger observational study on cardiovascular health in physician burnout. Inclusion in the burnout group required an emotional exhaustion score ≥27 and/or depersonalization score ≥10 (with a minimum emotional exhaustion score of 20) on the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey. Controls had to score below 16 on emotional exhaustion and below 7 on depersonalization [1]. Additional criteria included moderate or lower depressive symptoms and at least 6 months of job-related stress in the burnout group, and no more than mild depressive symptoms in controls. This approach limited confounding by major depression while preserving real-world overlap between burnout and subthreshold depressive symptoms. All participants were non-smokers, aged 28–65 years, without known cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or major lifetime psychiatric disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the local ethics committee Zurich (BASEC No. 2018-01974).

Arterial Stiffness

PWVao (m/s) was measured noninvasively using the Arteriograph device (TensioMed Ltd.), a validated oscillometric system [12]. Measurements were taken in the sitting position after a 5-minute rest. The Arteriograph determines PWVao based on the time difference between the first (direct) and reflected pressure waves. Only recordings with quality criteria in the green range (standard deviation of PWVao <1.0 m/s) were included. For participants with two valid measurements, the mean value was used. PWVao is normal below 9.0 m/s.

Sleep Quality

Sleep quality over the past four weeks was assessed using the PSQI, a validated 19-item self-report instrument comprising seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction [13]. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, and the global score (range 0–21) reflects overall sleep quality, with higher scores indicating worse sleep. A cutoff score >5 distinguishes poor from good sleepers.

Covariates

Covariates, selected a priori for their known associations with arterial stiffness and/or sleep quality, included age (self-reported in years), body mass index (BMI, kg/m2; calculated from measured height and weight), self-reported habitual physical activity (times/week with sweat-inducing exercise), peripheral heart rate, and peripheral systolic blood pressure. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured twice with the Arteriograph device, and the averages were used in analyses.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 (IBM Corp.), with significance set at two-tailed p<0.05. Missing data (3.1% for PSQI, 3.3% for arteriography, and one poor-quality PWVao recording) were imputed using the expectation–maximization algorithm, as Little’s missing completely at random (MCAR) test (p=0.82) confirmed the MCAR assumption. Group differences were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test, and associations between continuous variables with Pearson correlations. Separate multiple linear regression models were run with normally distributed PWVao as the dependent variable. Predictors were mean-centered to reduce collinearity and improve interpretability, making the intercept reflect expected PWVao at average covariate values. Fully adjusted models included seven to eight theory-based predictors, a ratio that can raise overfitting risk given the sample size. Safeguards included collinearity checks, multivariate outlier screening (Mahalanobis distance, p<0.001), and interpretation based on statistical significance and effect size (partial r2). Model 1 examined burnout status as the sole predictor of PWVao, whereas Model 2 examined the PSQI global score as the sole predictor. Model 3 included both burnout status and the PSQI global score in the same model to test their independent, additive associations with PWVao. Model 4 extended Model 3 by adding the burnout×PSQI interaction term to test whether the association between sleep quality and PWVao differed by burnout status (moderation analysis). This sequential approach allowed for disentangling the main effects of burnout and sleep quality from their interactive effect.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

Table 1 summarizes participant characteristics by burnout status and sleep quality. One in four participants was classified as poor sleepers (PSQI global score >5), with a higher prevalence in the burnout group (40%) than controls (10%). Accordingly, the burnout group showed a higher mean PSQI global score and reported poorer subjective sleep quality, longer sleep latency, and greater daytime dysfunction. No significant group differences were found in BMI, physical activity, or cardiovascular measures, including PWVao. Poor sleepers did not differ from good sleepers in any characteristics other than PSQI component scores. In the full sample, global PSQI score was significantly associated with BMI (r=0.293, p=0.023), but not with any other clinical variable, including PWVao (p=0.94).

Group-Dependent Associations between Sleep Quality and Pulse Wave Velocity

Table 2 shows that neither burnout nor global sleep quality was independently associated with PWVao, whether examined separately (Models 1 and 2) or jointly (Model 3). In the fully adjusted Model 4, however, a significant burnout×PSQI interaction emerged (B=0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.095 to 0.636; p=0.009), accounting for 12.6% of the unique variance and suggesting clinical relevance. In other words, for each 1-point increase in PSQI score (poorer sleep), PWVao increased by 0.366 m/s more in burnout than in controls, consistent with Fig. 1A: the association was positive in burnout (B=0.197; 95% CI, −0.023 to 0.418; p=0.076) and negative in controls (B=−0.181; 95% CI, −0.376 to 0.014; p=0.067). Although neither within-group slope was significant, the interaction indicates a significant difference in slope between groups, with poorer sleep linked to steeper PWVao increases in burnout.
This group-dependent effect was driven by the PSQI sleep duration component, which showed a significant group×sleep duration interaction (B=0.926; 95% CI, 0.159 to 1.693; p=0.019; unique variance explained=10.3%). A 1-point increase in the PSQI sleep duration score (shorter habitual sleep) was associated with a 0.926 m/s greater PWVao in the burnout group than in controls. As shown in Fig. 1B, the associations were in opposite directions: positive in the burnout group (B=0.252; 95% CI, −0.383 to 0.887; p=0.42) and negative in controls (B=−0.671; 95% CI, −1.182 to −0.160; p=0.012), indicating that shorter sleep was linked to higher PWVao only in the burnout group. To better contextualize sleep duration, we extracted the self-reported values from participant files: 30 participants (50%) slept >7 hours/night in the past 4 weeks, 26 (43.3%) slept 6–7 hours, and 4 (6.7%) slept 5–6 hours.
No significant interactions between burnout status and any of the other PSQI components were observed in relation to PWVao. As expected, higher heart rate and older age were significantly associated with higher PWVao, whereas systolic blood pressure, BMI, and physical activity showed no significant associations with PWVao.

DISCUSSION

This study found that poorer, particularly shorter, sleep was associated with greater arterial stiffness, but only in physicians with occupational burnout. Importantly, the significant interaction between burnout and sleep quality means the difference in slopes between groups is statistically reliable, even though neither within-group slope alone reached significance; this is a common pattern when the relationship between two variables changes direction across subgroups. This suggests that psychosocial stressors may amplify the cardiovascular effects of sleep disturbances, a relationship previously highlighted as needing further study [14]. Our findings show that the impact on arterial stiffness is context-dependent, emerging only under high occupational stress, and, to our knowledge, are the first to report such an interaction in physicians. These findings align with our earlier report [10], linking poor sleep to impaired coronary microvascular function only in burnout, reinforcing that high occupational stress amplifies cardiovascular risk of poor sleep across vascular beds.
Short sleep duration emerged as the main driver of arterial stiffness. Sleep restriction can impair endothelial function, elevate sympathetic activity, and increase arterial stiffness [14]. Our findings extend this evidence by showing that burnout may magnify these effects even in a relatively healthy, professionally active cohort. The effect was clinically meaningful: in our sample, reducing sleep from >7 hours to 6–7 hours/night corresponded to a 0.93 m/s higher PWVao in burnout compared to controls. A 1 m/s PWVao increase has been linked to 14%–15% higher risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, likely through increased left ventricular afterload, hypertrophy, and impaired coronary perfusion [15]. Similarly, a 3-point higher PSQI global score corresponded to a 1.1 m/s higher PWVao in burnout compared to controls.
Neither burnout nor sleep quality alone was associated with PWVao in the full sample, likely reflecting careful matching on cardiovascular risk factors, the relatively healthy and functionally preserved status of participants, and low variability in cardiovascular risk. The significant burnout-by-sleep quality interaction indicates that poor sleep predicted greater stiffness only in the presence of burnout, suggesting that high psychosocial stress amplifies vascular impact of sleep disturbance even in the absence of overt disease. Interestingly, in controls, shorter sleep duration was significantly associated with lower PWVao, and poorer global sleep quality showed a similar trend. Although speculative, these inverse patterns may reflect physiological resilience, chance variation given the modest sample size, or sample-specific effects and warrant replication in larger studies.
Clinically, these results support integrated cardiovascular risk management in high-stress professions. Routine sleep assessment in individuals with burnout may help identify those at increased vascular risk. Interventions targeting sleep hygiene, work-hour regulation, and stress reduction could help mitigate long-term cardiovascular burden. Relevant to our findings, weekend catch-up sleep has been linked to lower burnout risk in medical staff with weekday sleep <7 hours [16]. Objective vascular measures such as PWVao could further refine occupational health screening when burnout and sleep complaints co-occur.
Limitations include the cross-sectional design, modest sample size, male-only sample, and reliance on subjective sleep measures. Nevertheless, the findings highlight that poor sleep quality, especially short sleep duration, was associated with increased arterial stiffness in physicians with burnout. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing and improving sleep health in high-stress occupational settings, both for psychological well-being and for cardiovascular prevention. Future studies should aim to replicate these findings in larger, mixed-gender cohorts, ideally incorporating objective sleep metrics.

NOTES

Availability of Data and Material
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Roland von Känel, Sarah A. Holzgang, Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Mary Princip. Data curation: Sarah A. Holzgang, Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Sinthujan Sivakumar. Formal analysis: Roland von Känel. Funding acquisition: Roland von Känel. Investigation: Sarah A. Holzgang, Sinthujan Sivakumar, Aju P. Pazhenkottil. Methodology: Roland von Känel, Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Mary Princip. Project administration: Roland von Känel, Sarah A. Holzgang, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Mary Princip. Resources: Aju P. Pazhenkottil. Software: Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Sinthujan Sivakumar. Supervision: Roland von Känel, Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Mary Princip. Validation: Roland von Känel, Mary Princip. Visualization: Roland von Känel. Writing—original draft: Roland von Känel. Writing—review & editing: all authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Statement
The study was financially supported by an institutional grant from the University of Zurich, Switzerland, to R.v.K.
Acknowledgements
During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) to optimize language style. After using this tool the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

REFERENCES

1. Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, Rosales RC, Guille C, Sen S, et al. Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA 2018;320:1131-50.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Toker S, Melamed S, Berliner S, Zeltser D, Shapira I. Burnout and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study of 8838 employees. Psychosom Med 2012;74:840-7.
pmid
3. Stewart NH, Arora VM. The impact of sleep and circadian disorders on physician burnout. Chest 2019;156:1022-30.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Lao XQ, Liu X, Deng HB, Chan TC, Ho KF, Wang F, et al. Sleep quality, sleep duration, and the risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study with 60,586 adults. J Clin Sleep Med 2018;14:109-17.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:636-46.
pmid
6. Del Brutto OH, Mera RM, Peñaherrera E, Costa AF, Peñaherrera R, Castillo PR. On the association between sleep quality and arterial stiffness: a population study in community-dwelling older adults living in rural Ecuador (the Atahualpa Project). J Clin Sleep Med 2019;15:1101-6.
crossref pmid pmc
7. May RW, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA, Fincham FD. School burnout: increased sympathetic vasomotor tone and attenuated ambulatory diurnal blood pressure variability in young adult women. Stress 2015;18:11-9.
crossref pmid
8. Ko DT, Chu A, Austin PC, Johnston S, Nallamothu BK, Roifman I, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes among practicing physicians vs the general population in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1915983.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Sara JD, Prasad M, Eleid MF, Zhang M, Widmer RJ, Lerman A. Association between work-related stress and coronary heart disease: a review of prospective studies through the job strain, effort-reward balance, and organizational justice models. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:PMID: e008073.
crossref
10. von Känel R, Princip M, Holzgang SA, Rossi A, Giannopoulos AA, Buechel RR, et al. Association between global sleep quality and coronary microvascular function in male physicians with occupational burnout. Psychosom Med 2024;86:216-26.
crossref pmid
11. von Känel R, Princip M, Holzgang SA, Garefa C, Rossi A, Benz DC, et al. Coronary microvascular function in male physicians with burnout and job stress: an observational study. BMC Med 2023;21:477.
pmid pmc
12. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, Alessandri N, Tufano F, Kis P, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2010;28:2068-75.
crossref pmid
13. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193-213.
crossref pmid
14. Hall MH, Brindle RC, Buysse DJ. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: emerging opportunities for psychology. Am Psychol 2018;73:994-1006.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1318-27.
pmid
16. Lin YL, Chen CH, Chu WM, Hu SY, Liou YS, Yang YC, et al. Modifiable risk factors related to burnout levels in the medical workplace in Taiwan: cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e032779.
crossref pmid pmc

Fig. 1
Partial regression plots with fit lines (95% confidence intervals) showing the positive associations of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score (A) and PSQI sleep duration score (B) with aortic pulse wave velocity in 30 physicians with burnout compared to 30 controls without burnout. Analyses were adjusted for peripheral heart rate, peripheral systolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and physical activity. The interaction between group and PSQI global score was significant (p=0.009; p=0.076 in the burnout group, p=0.067 in the control group), as was the interaction between group and PSQI sleep duration score (p=0.019; p=0.420 in the burnout group, p=0.012 in the control group).
smr-2025-03034f1.jpg
Table 1
Participant characteristics stratified by burnout status and sleep quality
All (n=60) Burnout p-value Sleep quality p-value


Yes (n=30) No (n=30) Poor (n=15) Good (n=45)
Age (yr) 49.9±9.6 46.8±10.6 52.9±7.5 0.022* 48.5±9.2 50.3±9.8 0.533
Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.0±3.0 25.6±3.1 24.3±2.7 0.080 25.9±3.0 24.7±2.9 0.127
Physical activity (times/wk) 2.33±1.80 1.99±1.62 2.67±1.92 0.160 2.10±1.45 2.41±1.90 0.705
PSQI global score 4.32±2.11 5.40±1.65 3.23±1.98 <0.001* 7.13±1.06 3.38±1.42 <0.001*
PSQI subjective sleep quality 0.95±0.65 1.23±0.57 0.67±0.61 <0.001* 1.60±0.51 0.73±0.54 <0.001*
PSQI sleep latency 0.57±0.56 0.83±0.46 0.30±0.54 <0.001* 0.93±0.59 0.44±0.50 0.007*
PSQI sleep duration 0.57±0.62 0.53±0.63 0.60±0.62 0.642 0.93±0.59 0.44±0.59 0.007*
PSQI sleep efficiency 0.17±0.42 0.20±0.48 0.13±0.35 0.685 0.40±0.63 0.09±0.29 0.020*
PSQI sleep disturbance 1.00±0.41 1.17±0.38 0.83±0.38 0.002 1.27±0.46 0.91±0.36 0.004*
PSQI use of sleep medication 0.08±0.33 0.07±0.25 0.10±0.40 0.973 0.27±0.59 0.02±0.15 0.017*
PSQI daytime dysfunction 0.98±0.75 1.37±0.62 0.60±0.68 <0.001* 1.73±0.59 0.73±0.62 <0.001*
Peripheral heart rate (bpm) 67.7±12.0 68.7±10.0 66.8±13.9 0.375 69.6±14.7 67.1±11.1 0.952
Peripheral systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 130.9±12.6 132.5±14.1 129.3±10.8 0.501 130.4±10.5 131.1±13.3 0.912
Aortic pulse wave velocity (m/s) 8.46±1.16 8.48±1.05 8.44±1.28 0.847 8.53±1.18 8.44±1.14 0.966

Poor sleep quality was defined as a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score >5. Group differences were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test for two independent samples. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

* Significant p-values are shown.

Table 2
Multivariable associations of burnout, sleep quality, and their interaction with aortic pulse wave velocity
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Constant 8.463*** 8.463*** 8.463*** 8.463*** 8.463*** 8.463*** 7.184*** 7.476***
Burnout −0.101 (−0.621 to 0.419) 0.201 (−0.318 to 0.719) −0.054 (−0.665 to 0.556) 0.248 (−0.351 to 0.846) −2.199** (−3.545 to −0.852) −1.448* (−2.825 to −0.072)
PSQI global score −0.028 (−0.152 to 0.095) 0.006 (−0.115 to 0.127) −0.022 (−0.167 to 0.124) −0.022 (−0.161 to 0.117) −0.219* (−0.392 to −0.045) −0.178* (−0.353 to −0.003)
Burnout×PSQI global score 0.474*** (0.203 to 0.745) 0.366** (0.095 to 0.636)
Peripheral HR 0.046*** (0.023 to 0.068) 0.043*** (0.019 to 0.068) 0.046*** (0.023 to 0.068) 0.043*** (0.019 to 0.067) 0.046*** (0.023 to 0.069) 0.044*** (0.020 to 0.069) 0.050*** (0.029 to 0.071) 0.050*** (0.026 to 0.073)
Peripheral SBP 0.018 (−0.003 to 0.040) 0.010 (−0.012 to 0.032) 0.018 (−0.003 to 0.039) 0.011 (−0.001 to 0.033) 0.018 (−0.004 to 0.040) 0.010 (−0.013 to 0.032) 0.019 (−0.0004 to 0.039) 0.012 (−0.010 to 0.033)
Age 0.054*** (0.025 to 0.083) 0.051*** (0.023 to 0.079) 0.054*** (0.025 to 0.083) 0.043**(0.014 to 0.072)
Body mass index −0.012 (−0.103 to 0.079) −0.007 (−0.102 to 0.088) −0.008 (−0.103 to 0.087) −0.004 (−0.094 to 0.086)
Physical activity −0.114 (−0.282 to 0.054) −0.117 (−0.288 to 0.053) −0.109 (−0.281 to 0.063) −0.060 (−0.226 to 0.107)

Values are unstandardized beta coefficients (95% confidence interval) from linear regression models. In all models, variables were entered in a single block, with peripheral HR and SBP entered first as key hemodynamic controls, followed by age, body mass index, and physical activity. Model 1 tested the association between burnout and pulse wave velocity. Model 2 tested the association between sleep quality (PSQI global score) and pulse wave velocity. Model 3 included both burnout and PSQI global score to assess their independent contributions. Model 4 tested for a moderation effect by including an interaction term between burnout and PSQI global score.

* p<0.050;

** p<0.010;

*** p<0.001.

HR, heart rate; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
702
View
7
Download